Skip to main content

Sontag, a Discovery

Reborn: Journals & Notebooks 1947-1963

Susan Sontag, essayist, novelist, consummate critic of art and aesthetics, died of lung cancer in 2004. The public would have to wait another four years to read the creed she wrote at the age of fourteen stating her atheism, her opinions on government, the relation of action to happiness, and that “the only difference between humans is intelligence.”

Edited by Sontag’s son David Rieff, a capable writer himself, Reborn is a collection and contraction of Sontag’s personal writings, the first of a trilogy to be published. The volume spans the time from Sontag’s fourteenth year through her early undergraduate experiences at Berkley as a sixteen-year-old, becoming a young writer and academic in New York City, her marriage, migrating to Oxford for a fellowship and abandoning it for Paris.

Neither a work of fiction, nor a book of essays, Reborn reveals the relentless quest for knowledge and experience that Sontag embarked on at a tender age. She writes lists of books to read, innumerable quotes and criticisms, the names of artists and works of art, films she has seen and has yet to see. Her autodidactic interests grasp at psychology, religion, philosophy, literature, visual art, music, and cinema. She is unabashedly Euro-centric, and her battle is against the philistinism of the modern age.

The journal has two veins: the intellectual, in which Sontag strives to educate herself in everything that interests her, and the interpersonal, in which she chronicles her experiences with lovers and friends, and her attempt to understand herself. Discovering quite early that she is attracted to women (“Nothing but humiliation and degradation at the thought of physical relations with a man…”), and having significant love affairs with two women that feature predominately in her journals (H and Irene), we as the reader are floored when Sontag chooses to marry professor Philip Rieff in a matter of days. On 21 November 1949 she writes “Today, a wonderful opportunity was offered me – to do some research work for a soc[iology] instructor named Philip Rieff…” On December 2nd she writes that “I am engaged to Philip Rieff” and on the 3rd of January “I marry Philip with full consciousness + fear of my will towards self-destructiveness.” (Rieff writes in the margin that these dates may not be correct.) She does not explain herself. Sontag is still veiled, even in her most personal notebooks.

But what business is it of ours to read the journals of artists and other notable figures? Is this “type” of reading to be labeled voyeurism? Sontag suggests an answer to this question in her essay the Artist as an exemplary sufferer:

“Why do we read a writer’s journal? Because it illuminates his [or her] books? Often it does we read the writer in the first person; we encounter the ego behind the masks of ego in an artist’s works. No degree of intimacy in a novel can supply this…” (Against Interpretation, 39).

Susan Sontag was a fierce intellectual and an expressive writer. Reading her journals was continually exhausting, disheartening, and worthwhile. Despite feeling she may disapprove of ones level of intelligence, the interest she stirs with her thoughts and her life experiences ennoble one to read books beyond ones immediate comprehension, to seek to expose oneself to works of art and late-night moments that stimulate one’s intellectual and emotional growth.


Popular posts from this blog

The Private Life of the Diary

I’ve kept a diary since I was twelve. While I composed nearly illegible autobiographical scratchings in my first years of primary school at my teachers’ request, it wasn’t until I was on the brink of becoming a teenager that I felt I needed a more permanent arrangement. I suspect it had to do with reading The Diary of Anne Frank. My diary’s function has changed over the years – it once had a name (having discovered that Zoe was the Greek word for life, I thought my choice extremely clever), and I used to like my diaries in a variety of shapes and sizes, spangled with glitter, ruled with wide lines, shackled with locks and keys. For at least eight years my diary was the space in which to vent my feelings, and offered some form of therapeutic comfort. This meant it was largely about boys and is, as a result, very tedious to reread. But while the function of my journal has changed, each volume has been a solution to the manic desire to scribble. As I discovered reading Anne Frank, each e…

Blast-beruffled plumes

I’ve returned to Minnesota to find it transformed into a Brueghel painting.

Our hunters are gone north or even south, wherever there are more deer. This has been a bad year for deer, threatened by the cold of last year’s polar vortex and the high population of coyotes, which now carry a bounty on their heads.

So, while it’s still autumn in England (I’ve been assured), winter has come. The nights are long, the wreaths are out. I’ve been reading restlessly – Robert Walser and GB Shaw. But some nights, Thomas Hardy feels just right for November melancholia. Here’s ‘A Darkling Thrush’:

I leant upon a coppice gate
When Frost was spectre-grey,
And Winter's dregs made desolate
The weakening eye of day.
The tangled bine-stems scored the sky
Like strings of broken lyres,
And all mankind that haunted nigh
Had sought their household fires.

The land's sharp features seemed to be
The Century's corpse outleant,
His crypt the cloudy canopy,

Cassandra at the Wedding - Dorothy Baker

The perfect airplane read for a person en route to a wedding, this tautly written 1962 novel about a woman falling apart, coming home to her family’s ranch to derail her twin sister’s wedding. That’s the summary – but obviously it’s about so much more: about the nature of love and obsession, about identity and the self.

Cassandra Edwards, named for the doomed wailer at the gates of Troy, is a student at Berkley, an “Existentialist-Zen-Marxist, Freudian branch. Deviation, rather.” The reader is fully aware from the beginning that Cassandra feels antagonistically about the wedding – she anticipates duties of “tak[ing] over the bouquet while [Judith] received the ring, through the nose or on the finger, wherever she chose to receive it…” She purposefully gets the groom’s name wrong. She plans to stage a “last-minute rescue.”

The isolated family ranch the Edwards family as a self-sufficient unit – emotionally and intellectually. Her alcoholic father, a retired skeptical philosopher who act…