Skip to main content

Sontag, a Discovery


Reborn: Journals & Notebooks 1947-1963

Susan Sontag, essayist, novelist, consummate critic of art and aesthetics, died of lung cancer in 2004. The public would have to wait another four years to read the creed she wrote at the age of fourteen stating her atheism, her opinions on government, the relation of action to happiness, and that “the only difference between humans is intelligence.”

Edited by Sontag’s son David Rieff, a capable writer himself, Reborn is a collection and contraction of Sontag’s personal writings, the first of a trilogy to be published. The volume spans the time from Sontag’s fourteenth year through her early undergraduate experiences at Berkley as a sixteen-year-old, becoming a young writer and academic in New York City, her marriage, migrating to Oxford for a fellowship and abandoning it for Paris.

Neither a work of fiction, nor a book of essays, Reborn reveals the relentless quest for knowledge and experience that Sontag embarked on at a tender age. She writes lists of books to read, innumerable quotes and criticisms, the names of artists and works of art, films she has seen and has yet to see. Her autodidactic interests grasp at psychology, religion, philosophy, literature, visual art, music, and cinema. She is unabashedly Euro-centric, and her battle is against the philistinism of the modern age.

The journal has two veins: the intellectual, in which Sontag strives to educate herself in everything that interests her, and the interpersonal, in which she chronicles her experiences with lovers and friends, and her attempt to understand herself. Discovering quite early that she is attracted to women (“Nothing but humiliation and degradation at the thought of physical relations with a man…”), and having significant love affairs with two women that feature predominately in her journals (H and Irene), we as the reader are floored when Sontag chooses to marry professor Philip Rieff in a matter of days. On 21 November 1949 she writes “Today, a wonderful opportunity was offered me – to do some research work for a soc[iology] instructor named Philip Rieff…” On December 2nd she writes that “I am engaged to Philip Rieff” and on the 3rd of January “I marry Philip with full consciousness + fear of my will towards self-destructiveness.” (Rieff writes in the margin that these dates may not be correct.) She does not explain herself. Sontag is still veiled, even in her most personal notebooks.

But what business is it of ours to read the journals of artists and other notable figures? Is this “type” of reading to be labeled voyeurism? Sontag suggests an answer to this question in her essay the Artist as an exemplary sufferer:

“Why do we read a writer’s journal? Because it illuminates his [or her] books? Often it does not...here we read the writer in the first person; we encounter the ego behind the masks of ego in an artist’s works. No degree of intimacy in a novel can supply this…” (Against Interpretation, 39).


Susan Sontag was a fierce intellectual and an expressive writer. Reading her journals was continually exhausting, disheartening, and worthwhile. Despite feeling she may disapprove of ones level of intelligence, the interest she stirs with her thoughts and her life experiences ennoble one to read books beyond ones immediate comprehension, to seek to expose oneself to works of art and late-night moments that stimulate one’s intellectual and emotional growth.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I’ve a short story in the latest edition of The Stinging Fly , which is a brilliant Irish literary journal. If you’d like a copy (or if you like Claire-Louise Bennett or Kevin Barry or Danielle McLaughlin or Colin Barrett, who’ve all been published by SF ) you can get it here Or, you know, go to Dublin.

Monologuing

My previous experience of Rachel Cusk is restricted to her travel book on Italy, The Last Supper , which was withdrawn in Britain because of objections from individuals who found themselves featured, unflatteringly, within its pages. It's very difficult not to write a book about Italy without being smug. Then I read reviews (especially hatchet jobs) about her controversial divorce memoir, Aftermath . I confess I’m suspicious when a writer writes memoir after memoir, as if his own life is the only field of interest. I read memoirs – I am moved by the familiar voice – but I’m wary of their cultural predominance. Self-knowledge is a good springboard for knowledge of others. Orbiting one’s own life without ever calling into question the limitation of it seems myopic. (This, however, is not to say that personal writing can be divorced from art, or that it should be.) But Outline is an expose of how fascinating and selfish and dreary and inescapable monologues on the self can be. The
There’s a sudden late surge of warmth in the rough winds today and it’s the perfect day to read one of John Clare’s best sonnets: November Sybil of months & worshipper of winds I love thee rude & boisterous as thou art & scraps of joy my wandering ever finds Mid thy uproarious madness – when the start Of sudden tempests stir the forrest leaves Into hoarse fury till the shower set free Still the hugh swells & ebb the mighty heaves That swing the forrest like a troubled sea I love the wizard noise & rave in turn Half vacant thoughts & self imagined rhymes Then hide me from the shower a short sojourn Neath ivied oak & mutter to the winds Wishing their melody belonged to me That I might breath a living song to thee